Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on May 2, 2013 in Critical Thinking, Featured Inc, philosophy, science | 7 comments

IBM versus GOD

It’s hard not to feel a little sad for God (or gods, if you like). There was a time when almost all of the humans believed God was everywhere and responsible for almost everything: creation, weather, ethics, and most importantly, who’d win at sports. Now, hardly anyone believes all of that. God lost his job as the cosmic mover-and-shaker and can only be found, even among the devout, consigned to invisible realms removed from all human activity such as heaven. Christians, for example, might be found to disagree with this, but they still buy insurance and get that MRI the doctor suggested, don’t they.

The dots are atoms

The dots are atoms

Today’s God, at least for Christians in modern industrial democracies, is a part-timer at best.  Apparently He turned the universe switch “on” then let it bake at 400 million degrees for a while. After cooling for several billion years, He then staged a dramatic play to save mankind from Himself, which everyone agreed was very entertaining and worth murdering nonbelievers for. After that, God went back into nap mode. A few times it seemed like Armageddon was at hand, but then He hit the snooze button. Now He gets the occasional parking space for the devout, or decides a Super Bowl, but mostly the universe just seems to run fine without Him. What a sad state for the being that used to hold up the sky and strike down the wicked with cool special effects like plagues and zombies. How did this happen?

Creation turned out to be easier than mankind originally expected. Lawrence Krauss and Stephen Hawking have basically argued that it required nothing. Literally nothing. That’s a crap entry on your resume: “Able to adequately perform as well as a featureless void”. The creation of life and biodiversity also required quite a bit less than godly psychokinesis: physical laws+time+ordinary sort of planet. No agency, no planning, no magical intervention was necessary. Hell, lowly humans created dogs & cats and now have even made fully artificial life forms. Alas for God, out-created by apes that believed in werewolves and imps and what not until a short time ago.

In short, if there were a God who personally created our universe, humans, and so on… He did it the hard way.

The apparent ever-shrinking of the God of the monotheists is an effect easily observable within my own lifetime. When I was a newly-minted nonbeliever teen in the 90’s, believers would occasionally make an argument such as “you have faith, too. Have you ever SEEN an atom? But you believe in them!” At the time, I had not and neither had anyone else (although the evidence for atoms and their structure was already overwhelming). This year an individual atom was photographed for the first time, even though they did not get its good side:

first-picture-shadow-single-atom_56198_600x450

And just this week the technowizards at IBM made a movie using as pixels individual atoms. The “smallest movie ever made.” Faith is not required, but wonder and astonishment are:

The gaps are now smaller and faith has no purchase. Atoms are now too big for God to hide in. The insult to His dignity continues unabated.

If you’re to invest in a triumvirate, it’s prudent to select IBM over G-O-D. The dividends are always better.

  • Kwame

    Apparently Noah got off the ark and handed the keys over to the cyber techs.

  • Reasonably Faithless

    I want to play Pong with atoms!

  • http://twitter.com/Wendy91602 Wendy Hughes

    Groovy essay! I think I began to realize I was an atheist when I realized the god I was used to was just the current version – and that Greek mythology was about the gods that society was used to – and the various gods of the Egyptians were the gods they were used to. It just took some time for the idea to develop that as time passes, new gods replace the old ones, and that means they are not infinite and omnipotent. It’s hard to describe – but I wonder what the next version will be of a supernatural being who answers prayers and runs things.

    • http://www.skepticink.com/incredulous Edward Clint

      Thank you Wendy, I’m glad you enjoyed it.

  • Dave Jonesy

    sylvia is a saint compared to you lying vultures….

    THE CULTURE INDUSTRY – THE IDEOLOGY OF DEATH

    youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X0Hez25fFrg

    HOW WE WON THE JAMES RANDI MILLION DOLLAR PARANORMAL CHALLENGE

    deltamachine.atspace.cc/

    my.alliant.edu/ICS/icsfs/skeptical-inquirer-cover-jan-feb-2013.png?target=4a3b9ed0-f5df-4fd6-a99e-bd803800e02f

    WORKS BOTH WAYS!

    • Writer Writer

      wow. Bona fide nutbar.

    • Writer Writer

      Do you mean Sylvia Brown(e), the convicted felon who is wrong many time more often than the times her guesses are close?

      And you claim to have won Randi’s challenge, do you? Funny he didn’t mention that to the 1500 people he spoke to in person last month